Make your own free website on Tripod.com

Interactive CV

USDA Grant
Home
HPED 570
Self Paced Learning Sample
HPED 442
Sample Rubric
HPED 731
HPED 105
HPED 569
HPED 445
National Endocrine Presentation
Public Health Forum, Greensboro, NC, 2006
Statement of Teaching Philosophy
Teaching
Health Disparities Grant- Healthy Lifestyles
USDA Grant- Baseline College Obesity-Related Risk
Prevalence of Type II Risk in Elderly
Lifestyle Activity vs. Traditional Activity & Obesity-Related Risk Factors

Research

A Baseline Assessment of Obesity-Related Risk Factors Among Minority College Students

A grant funded by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)

Abstract

Objectives: The present study identified and compared obesity-related risk factors  among male and female African-American college students between the ages of 18 and 25.

Methods: 500 college students voluntarily completed the survey assessments including volume of physical activity, stages of change for diet and physical activity, dietary food screeners, healthy lifestyle social support and peer influence, and food preference. In addition the students participated in measures of height, weight, blood pressure, waist circumference and body composition.  Data is currently being analyzed..
 

Results: forthcoming

Conclusions: Study ongoing.

An observational review of 21 studies in Medline found that physical activity, nutritional intake and social support have an influence on obesity-related risk. Other studies indicate that obesity, already a significant health issue among majority populations in the United States, is a health concern that disproportionately affects minority populations, specifically women. Disorders related to obesity, including diabetes, heart disease also affect these populations with similar proportions. In the United States, approximately 50 million or one in four adults have high blood pressure (HBP). In 1997, Blacks and Whites in the Southeastern United States experienced a much higher prevalence of HBP and increased rates of death from stroke than did those in other regions of the country. 1 As an example of the severity of this problem, when HBP exists with high blood cholesterol, diabetes, inactivity, smoking, and obesity, the risk of CHD increases several-fold. 17 Healthy People 2010 18 recognizes the need to investigate these risk factors, and also recognizes that studies of this nature in young men and women are lacking.

Healthy People 2010 targets for health disparities between African-Americans and Whites were not reduced. Data are needed to determine the risk factors for obesity-related disorders, and any variations in that risk which could lead to effective interventions, among minority college students. The college years are important, since many students develop eating habits that become long-term lifestyle patterns and beliefs that help explain these habits. Therefore, it is important to learn when ethnic differences for obesity-related risk factors are first apparent so that preventive interventions can be initiated before unhealthy lifestyles are established. The main objective of the study is to identify, determine and compare obesity-related risk factors in a minority college population. The specific objectives of the study were to (1) Identify the prevalence of obesity-related risk factors and determine if significant relationships exist among obesity-related risk factors and health behaviors, influences or perceptions.

Methods

Subject Recruitment And Selection

Five hundred college students at North Carolina Agricultural & Technical State University (NCATSU) were recruited to participate in the study. Two methods of subject recruitment were used: 1) Flyers with the study outline with inclusion and exclusion criteria, benefits, and investigator's phone number were distributed and posted by the investigators on the NCATSU campus in areas where students congregated. 2) Students in large classrooms with diverse majors and backgrounds were also approached. Subjects who met the inclusion criteria and agreed to participate in the study were asked to report to the investigator's laboratory on campus to take part in the study. Only one visit was necessary to collect all of the required data; and the entire process took approximately 120 minutes.

Subjects who were interested in participating in the study signed an informed consent form, approved by the NCATSU Institutional Review Board (IRB), before all tests were performed. Subjects' recruitment continued until the required number of subjects was reached. Subjects who volunteered to participate in the study and met the following criteria included College students at NCATSU during 2005-2006, were between 18 and 25 years of age, males and females, any major, were African-American, and were United States citizens.

Data Collection

All subjects were required to complete the Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Instruments (CRAIs) when they reported to the Human Nutrition Laboratory on campus. The CRAIs contained a socio-demographic questionnaire which included information regarding age, gender, weight, height, race and ethnic background, the student's class level and major, how long the student has lived in the United States, and if the student took any college nutrition classes prior to the study.

Volunteers completed the following surveys:

Physical Activity-  Paffenbarger Physical Activity Questionnaire, International Physical Activity Questionnaire (Short Format), and Stages of Change for Physical Activity Questionnaire.

Nutrition: National Institute of Health (NIH) Fruit and Vegetable Screener, NIH Dietary Fat Screener, and an extensive food preference questionnaire.

Social/Psychological: Two social and peer support surveys (Social Support Survey for Physical Activity- Rosenfeld, Richmond and Hardy, 1986)

Physical Measures were also taken:

Blood pressures- measured and recorded by the investigator, who was trained in taking blood pressure. Three blood pressure readings were recorded for each subject. The first reading was taken at the beginning of the study when the subject reported to the laboratory. The second and third readings were obtained at the end of the study before the subject left the laboratory. The mean of the three readings was calculated and recorded as the blood pressure. Blood pressure was assessed using a sphygmomanometer and a stethoscope.

Height- body height was measured with the individual standing without shoes, legs straight, shoulders relaxed, and head in the Frankfort horizontal plane, lying against a wall. Height was recorded to the nearest centimeter.

Weight- Weight was obtained with the subjects wearing light clothing and standing on the platform barefoot. Weight was assessed with a SECA platform scale (Madison, WI, USA) graduated to the nearest 0.1 kg. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated from the resulting height and weight measures with the formula. BMI= weight/height2.

Waist Circumference- Waist circumference was measured with the subject standing up. A flexible steel tape was used to measure the waist circumference at the level of the umbilicus.

Body composition- Body composition was measured using a gender-specific 3-site skinfold measurement via Lange skinfold calipers. Body density, and subsequently body composition were calculated using an ethnically appropriate formula.

Data analysis

Presentation of Preliminary Data at Public Health Forum

 

The Prevalence of Potentially Modifiable Obesity-Related Risk Factors Among African-American College Students.

 

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of potentially modifiable obesity-related risk factors (RF) in African-American college students ages 18-25. A voluntary convenience sample of students [N=215]; Males (M) n=106, 19.9 1.4 yrs.; Females (F) n=109, 20.5 1.7 yrs] was taken from a historically minority university. Data for the following variables were collected during one testing sessions: blood pressure (BP), body composition using] skinfold (SK) and girth measurements ‘including waist circumference (WAIST)]. According to BMI, 64  subjects were classified as obese and 57 were classified as overweight. 128 subjects had elevated systolic BP, while 130 subjects had elevated diastolic BP .  WAIST [100 and 88 cm for men and women, respectively] were indicative of increased risk for heart disease. Forty female and 16 male participants were at increased risk for heart disease with regard to waist circumference.